Washington State has a Sexual Predator on the loose 

His name is Chris Reykdal……

“it is quite simply inaccurate to say biologically that there are only boys and only girls”

Chris Reykdal

 “If they’re old enough to get pregnant, they’re old enough to make their own decisions about what happens with their bodies”

Chris Reykdal

Washington’s K-12 schools chief is advising the state’s school districts not to change their diversity, equity and inclusion programs and policies in response to the Trump administration’s recent directive to schools to eliminate “race-based decision-making” from their campuses by the end of the month or jeopardize their federal funding.

The law of the land is simple…

There are two genders Male and Female.

This has been the foundation from the beginning of time itself. Democrats have brought our country to such a low point, appointing all these DEI queer gender and the mentally retarded to hold office that we now have to go back to the beginning and remind the people who is in charge in America and its God and Donald Trump.

Donald Trump signs order proclaiming there are only two sexes.

The last person who actually said this was, well, God Himself… 

Genesis 5:1

“In the beginning God created man in two categories, male and female
Clearly in the beginning there were only two kinds of humans, male and female.”

A sexual predator is an individual who employs predatory or abusive methods (like lawfare) to obtain sexual contact with another person. (men in womans bathrooms) It is a pattern of actions aimed at exploiting others for sexual gratification, which can range from inappropriate comments to full-blown attacks. The term often refers to people who have been convicted of sexual offenses under criminal law.

‘What Is a Woman?’ Alabama Governor Signs Bill Declaring There Are Only Two Sexes

The democrat who is challenging God and “We The People” is a guy named Chris Reykdal, Washington’s Superintendent of Public Instruction. It seems his mission — not to improve education, not to raise test scores and certainly not to ensure fairness in girls’ sports. Instead, he’s going to war against female athletes by backing trans athletes at their expense.

The superintendent is challenging President Donald Trump’s executive order banning biological males from competing in women’s sports. Reykdal’s goal appears to overturn a common-sense policy designed to protect the very student-athletes he’s supposed to advocate for.

Democrats, the party of the Mentally Retarded

INSANE. Maryland Democrats are pushing HB380 which would allow vending machines with condoms to be available at your child’s kindergarten, nursery school, or elementary school.pic.twitter.com/X5yoAP3Jkm

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 21, 2025

Reykdal, never one to shy away from performative progressive outrage, slammed Trump’s order, calling it “patently discriminatory and unconstitutional.” He vowed Washington would “not back down” from its current policy allowing transgender athletes to compete based on gender identity rather than biological sex. In his view, this is a matter of “equity.” But what about fairness? What about women and girls who have spent their entire lives training, only to be forced into unfair and unsafe competition against biological males with undeniable physical advantages?

Democrats like Reykdal use trans athletes to attack women’s rights

The battle around trans athletes was one started by a small group of activists on the Left. They forced the country to accept their radical position, despite firm and overwhelming opposition. And while they present the issue as about equity, it’s always been about their own narcissism; to be seen as heroes fighting for the marginalized.

This issue isn’t about hating transgender athletes. No one is calling for their exclusion from sports. But compassion for one group cannot mean we strip another of its rights. Female athletes fought for generations to have equal opportunities in sports. Title IX was a landmark victory, ensuring girls and women had access to fair and competitive athletics. That’s what makes this so infuriating — Reykdal and his ideological allies are actively dismantling those hard-fought protections in the name of “inclusion.”

But “inclusion” isn’t the same as fairness.

This isn’t even controversial

When biological males enter female sports, they bring undeniable advantages: greater muscle mass, bone density, lung capacity and testosterone-driven strength. Studies have confirmed these biological realities, yet activists pretend they don’t exist.

We’ve already seen the consequences in real life — female athletes losing records, championships, and even opportunities to stand on the podium because they were forced to compete against biological males. And yet, Reykdal insists that there is no legitimate policy argument against trans athletes competing in women’s sports. Instead, he said Trump’s executive order is “an attack on the specific student groups that anti-discrimination laws aim to protect.” Really? Ask the teenage girl who trains every day only to watch a biological male dominate her event. Ask the college swimmer who lost an NCAA title to a competitor who went through male puberty. Ask the young women forced to share locker rooms with biological males because activists like Reykdal refuse to acknowledge reality.

The Democrats’ version of an anti-discrimination law discriminates against women.

Trump’s trans athletes ban is unlawful? What about the Biden precedent?

Reykdal claims Trump’s executive order is “unlawful,” but that argument doesn’t hold up.

There is no constitutional right to compete in a sports league of your choosing. However, there is a constitutional right to equal protection under the law — and when states allow biological males into women’s sports, they are effectively discriminating against biological females.

If Washington State (or any other state) wants to defy federal law, that’s their prerogative. But here’s the catch: they don’t get to keep federal funding while doing it. The Biden administration weaponized federal dollars to force progressive policies on states, from pushing critical race theory in classrooms to making school lunch programs dependent on compliance with radical gender ideology. Why should the same logic not apply here? If a state refuses to protect female athletes, it shouldn’t expect the federal government to bankroll its discrimination.

Using kids as props

Reykdal’s posturing doesn’t just harm female athletes; it’s also deeply unfair to trans athletes.

By refusing to acknowledge biological realities, he’s setting up trans athletes for failure and pitting them against women in a way that creates resentment and backlash. Polls on this topic make that abundantly clear. There are solutions that could allow trans athletes to compete without dismantling women’s sports. Some states have considered separate divisions, and others have proposed open categories. But progressives like Reykdal won’t even entertain these ideas because they’re too focused on ideological purity, even if it harms young women.

This fight is about fairness. It’s about protecting opportunities for female athletes while still showing respect and compassion for transgender individuals. What it shouldn’t be about is one man’s crusade to impose his extreme ideology at the expense of the very students he was elected to serve. He and others on the far Left would understand that if they weren’t too busy using students who identify as transgender as political props.

Reykdal said he won’t back down. Well, neither should the girls fighting for their right to fair competition.